Yes. AI developers buy internal chat and email to build simulated workplaces for AI agents. Closed startups have reportedly sold Slack, email and ticket archives for $10,000 to $100,000 each, one for hundreds of thousands of dollars, and a bankrupt airline's roughly 100 million emails and 500 million Teams chats drew a $10 million bid in 2026. It is also the riskiest category to sell: archives are full of employee and customer personal information, so de-identification, a review of what employees were told, and a license that restricts use come before any transfer.
- Buyers pay for depth: real disagreements, decisions and follow-through, not announcements.
- Archives linked to tickets, code or documents are worth more than chat alone.
- Employee privacy is the deal-breaker. Plan the de-identification before the price conversation.
Can you sell internal Slack, Teams or email data?
Yes. In the US no federal law bans a company from licensing its own workplace communications, and buyers are active. A firm that helps startups shut down reported about 100 such data deals in a year, paying $10,000 to $100,000 each, and one closed startup received hundreds of thousands of dollars for its Slack messages, emails and Jira tickets, Fast Company reported, citing Forbes.
Operating companies can license too, but the stakes differ. A closed startup has no employees left to object and no ongoing customer relationships. A running business does, which is why most should license a defined, de-identified slice rather than the whole archive.
What buyers use workplace chat and email for
The demand comes from AI agents: software meant to plan, coordinate and finish work. Training and testing one needs realistic workplaces: how a team triages a bug, negotiates a deadline or escalates a customer problem.
Buyers want varied, deep records with disagreements and judgment calls, and one company's Slack can be worth more than another's Slack, email and calendars combined, MIT Technology Review reported. Sellers interviewed there valued archives by headcount, years in operation, data volume and how heavily the team actually used its tools.
What chat and email archives have sold for
All figures are as reported. Most sales are private and terms are rarely confirmed.
| Seller | What was sold | Reported value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closed startups, through a wind-down firm | Slack, email and ticket archives | $10,000 to $100,000 per deal, about 100 deals in a year | Fast Company, citing Forbes |
| One closed transcription startup | Slack messages, emails and Jira tickets | Hundreds of thousands of dollars | Fast Company, citing Forbes |
| One closed crypto startup | Workspace data from Google, Notion, Figma and Slack | Likely around $15,000, pending | MIT Technology Review |
| A bankrupt airline | About 100 million emails and 500 million Teams chats, plus documents | $10 million winning bid, awaiting court approval | Axios |
What makes one archive worth more than another
| Raises value | Lowers value |
|---|---|
| Active channels where work was discussed and decided | Announcement channels and automated bot traffic |
| Threads that link to tickets, pull requests or documents | Chat with no record of what happened next |
| Several years of continuous history | Short retention windows or deleted channels |
| A clear industry or function, such as engineering or operations | Mostly social or off-topic conversation |
| Metadata kept: timestamps, channels, roles, thread structure | Flattened text exports without structure |
Rights and privacy checks before selling workplace communications
The objection to the airline sale came from employees, not customers. The flight attendants' union told the court employee data is more sensitive than customer data and that de-identified records can still be linked back to people, Fortune reported. Expect the same question about your archive.
- Employee notices and policies. What did your handbook or acceptable-use policy say about monitoring and use of company systems? New York, for one, requires written notice of electronic monitoring of employees (N.Y. Civil Rights Law 52-c).
- Employee privacy rights. California's CCPA has covered employee personal information since January 2023 (California Attorney General). EU and UK staff fall under GDPR.
- Customers and partners inside the archive. Emails with customers may be covered by confidentiality clauses or data processing agreements.
- Privileged and sensitive material. Remove legal advice, HR investigations, health and benefits discussions, and credentials pasted into chat.
- Platform terms. Confirm your plan allows the export you need and that the license covers only data your company controls.
How to prepare an archive without exporting it first
You do not need to move anything to find out whether a buyer is interested. Describe the archive at company level first.
- List the workspaces and mailboxes, the years covered and approximate message counts.
- Name the channels or teams with the most substantive work, such as engineering, support or operations.
- Note what must be excluded: HR, legal, executive and any channel with health or financial details.
- Decide who signs off: an owner, counsel and, where relevant, whoever owns employee communications.
- Only after a buyer confirms interest: agree on de-identification standards, sample size and the license terms in writing.
When not to sell your chat and email
If the useful material cannot be separated from personal or privileged content, if employee notices clearly promised a narrower use, or if your customer contracts prohibit disclosure, the risk is likely larger than the payment. A smaller scope, such as one engineering channel, is often the workable option.
Origin Data Partners is not a law firm. This guide summarizes public sources so you can frame questions for your own counsel. It is not legal advice.
Common questions
How much are old Slack messages worth to AI companies?
Reported deals for closed startups range from about $10,000 to $100,000, with at least one reaching hundreds of thousands of dollars. Value depends on how much real work was discussed, years of history and links to tickets or code.
Is it legal to sell employee emails for AI training?
No US federal law bans it, but employee notices, state privacy laws such as California's CCPA, customer contracts and GDPR for EU staff can restrict it. De-identification and a restrictive license are standard safeguards. Get legal advice first.
Do I have to export my Slack to find out if it has value?
No. A first conversation can work from a description: workspaces, years covered, volume and which teams used it most.
Sources and further reading
Origin Data Partners is independent and not affiliated with any buyer named on this page.
- MIT Technology Review: AI labs buying data from shut-down startups (Oct 2026)
- Fast Company, citing Forbes: startups selling Slack chats and emails (Apr 2026)
- Axios: airline emails and chats sold in bankruptcy (Aug 2026)
- Fortune: flight attendants object to employee data sale (Aug 2026)
- California Attorney General: CCPA
- New York Civil Rights Law 52-c: electronic monitoring notice
